Re: Anyone else disappointed with gargleblaster?
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:46 pm
I tried to take a picture but hot damn it's HARD to get the color to show up properly on photo! It doesn't help that there's no natural light so I had to cope with the lighting in our bathroom. Anyway, here are two shots. All I have on is Groove (over SN primer on the lid, foiled on the lower lashline) and a very thin line of Coal.
It doesn't look so green in the last picture and the shimmer doesn't show up properly but hey, I tried
Anyway, my point is that if you want green I think Groove might be better than Gargleblaster, but it's not what you want if you're looking for a cool, emerald green shade as it is a warm green. It is also not really green-green but more of a brownish green, but then there's the sparkle and the complexity about the color that makes it look different in different lights... ah!
It doesn't look so green in the last picture and the shimmer doesn't show up properly but hey, I tried
Anyway, my point is that if you want green I think Groove might be better than Gargleblaster, but it's not what you want if you're looking for a cool, emerald green shade as it is a warm green. It is also not really green-green but more of a brownish green, but then there's the sparkle and the complexity about the color that makes it look different in different lights... ah!